Ombudsman Act

*****TRANSFORMING CLIENTS INTO CITIZENS******

CONCERNED CITIZENS PETITION WORKS!

It took a while but the petition from Concerned Citizens of Shelburne appears to have worked. Congratulations to the more than 500 who signed on!

Want to know more about keeping government agencies honest, read the Act here.

Ombudsman Act

CHAPTER 327 OF THE REVISED STATUTES, 1989

amended 2004, c. 6, ss. 25, 26

An Act to Establish the Office of the Ombudsman

Short title

1 This Act may be cited as the Ombudsman Act. R.S., c. 327, s. 1.

Interpretation

2 In this Act,
(a) "agency" means an agency, board, commission, foundation or corporation established under an enactment that
(i) is appointed or has a majority of its members appointed by the Governor in Council, a member of the Executive Council or the Province, or
(ii) is supported by or directs the expenditure of public funds of the Province and is designated by the Governor in Council;
(b) "chief officer" includes a deputy minister, the head or chief executive officer of an agency, the mayor of a city or incorporated town, the warden of a municipality to which the Municipal Act applies and the head or chief executive officer of a municipal agency;
(c) "department" means a department of the Government of Nova Scotia and includes an agency
(d) "House" means the House of Assembly;
(e) "minister" means the member of the Executive Council who presides over a department or who is in charge of or responsible for an agency;
(f) "municipal agency" means an agency, board, school board, commission, foundation, corporation, hospital or a welfare, penal or other institution established by or on behalf of or controlled by a municipal unit or two or more municipal units;
(g) "municipal unit" means a municipality to which the Municipal Act applies, a city or an incorporated town, and includes a municipal agency;
(h) "officer" means any official, employee or member of a department or a municipal unit;
(i) "Ombudsman" means the Ombudsman appointed under this Act. R.S., c. 327, s. 2; 2004, c. 6, s. 25.

Ombudsman
3 (1) There is hereby established, as an officer of the House, a commissioner for investigations to be called the Ombudsman.
(2) The Ombudsman shall be appointed by the Governor in Council.
(3) The Ombudsman may not be a member of the House and shall not hold any office of trust or profit, other than his office as Ombudsman, or engage in any occupation for reward outside the duties of his office without prior approval in each particular case by the House or by the Governor in Council when the House is not in session.
(4) The Ombudsman shall be paid such salary as is determined from time to time by the Governor in Council.
(5) Before entering upon the exercise of the duties of his office the Ombudsman shall take an oath that he will faithfully and impartially perform the duties of his office and will not divulge any information received by him under this Act except for the purpose of giving effect to this Act.
(6) The Speaker or the Chief Clerk of the House shall administer the oath referred to in subsection (5).
(7) The costs and expenses incurred by the Ombudsman or in the administration of the Act may be paid from the Consolidated Fund of the Province. R.S., c. 327, s. 3.

Term of office
4 (1) Unless his office sooner becomes vacant, the Ombudsman is to hold office for five years from the date of his appointment under Section 3 and, if otherwise qualified, is eligible to be re-appointed.
(2) The Ombudsman may resign his office by notice in writing addressed to the Speaker of the House or, if there is no Speaker or if the Speaker is absent from the Province, to the Chief Clerk of the House. R.S., c. 327, s. 4.

Removal or suspension
5 (1) On the recommendation of the House, the Governor in Council may remove or suspend the Ombudsman from his office for cause or incapacity.
(2) When the House is not in session, a judge of the Trial Division of the Supreme Court may suspend the Ombudsman from his office for cause or incapacity upon an application by the Governor in Council.
(3) Where the Governor in Council makes an application under subsection (2), the practice and procedure of the Supreme Court shall apply mutatis mutandis to the application.
(4) Where a judge of the Trial Division of the Supreme Court suspends the Ombudsman under subsection (2) that judge shall
(a) request the Governor in Council to appoint a person as an acting Ombudsman to hold office until the suspension has been dealt with by the House; and
(b) table a report of the suspension within ten days following the commencement of the next ensuing session of the House.
(5) A suspension under subsection (2) is not to continue beyond the end of the next ensuing session of the House. R.S., c. 327, s. 5.

Extent of disclosure in report of Ombudsman
6 Notwithstanding subsection (5) of Section 3, the Ombudsman may disclose in a report made by him under this Act any matters which, in his opinion, are necessary to disclose in order to establish grounds for his conclusions and recommendations. R.S., c. 327, s. 6.

Personnel
7 (1) The Ombudsman may, subject to the approval of the Governor in Council, appoint such assistants and employees as he deems necessary for the efficient carrying out of his functions under this Act.
(2) Before performing any official duty under this Act a person appointed under subsection (1) shall take an oath, to be administered by the Ombudsman, that he will not divulge any information received by him under this Act, except for the purpose of giving effect to this Act. R.S., c. 327, s. 7.

Delegation of powers
8 (1) The Ombudsman, by writing under his signature, may delegate to a person appointed an assistant under subsection (1) of Section 7 any of his powers under this Act except the power of delegation and the power to make a report under this Act.
(2) A person purporting to exercise power of the Ombudsman by virtue of a delegation under subsection (1) shall produce evidence of his authority to exercise that power when required to do so. R.S., c. 327, s. 8.

Ombudsman as commissioner
9 For the purposes of this Act, the Ombudsman is a commissioner under the Public Inquires Act. R.S., c. 327, s. 9.

Act does not apply
10 This Act does not apply
(a) to judges and justices or to the functions of any court of the Province; and
(b) to deliberations and proceedings of the Executive Council or any committee thereof. R.S., c. 327, s. 10.

Investigation
11 (1) Subject to subsection (2), where any person is aggrieved or, in the opinion of the Ombudsman, may be aggrieved, the Ombudsman, on the written complaint of or on behalf of the person aggrieved or on his own motion, may investigate the administration
(a) by a department or an officer thereof, of any law of the Province;
(b) by a municipal unit or an officer thereof, of any law of the municipal unit or any law of the Province that applies to the municipal unit.
(2) Notwithstanding subsection (1), the Ombudsman shall not investigate
(a) any decision, recommendation, act or omission in respect of which there is under any Act a right of appeal or objection or a right to apply for a review on the merits of the case to any court or to any tribunal constituted by or under any Act, whether or not that right of appeal or objection or application has been exercised in the particular case and whether or not any time prescribed for the exercise of that right has expired; or
(b) any decision, recommendation, act or omission of any person acting as a solicitor or prosecuting officer for the Crown or acting as council for the Crown in relation to any proceeding.
(3) Where a question arises as to the jurisdiction of the Ombudsman to investigate a grievance under this Act, he may apply to the Appeal Division of the Supreme Court for a determination of the question of his jurisdiction. R.S., c. 327, s. 11.

Complaint, referral of petition or letter from inmate or patient
12 (1) Subject to the provisions of this Act, a person may apply by written complaint to the Ombudsman to investigate a grievance.
(2) Notwithstanding Sections 14, 20 and 21, a committee of the House may refer any petition that is before the committee for consideration or any matter relating to such petition to the Ombudsman for investigation and report.
(3) Notwithstanding Sections 14, 20 and 21, where a matter has been referred to the Ombudsman under subsection (2), the Ombudsman, subject to any special directions of the committee, shall investigate the matter as far as it is within his jurisdiction and shall make such report to the committee as he thinks fit.
(4) Notwithstanding any Act, where a letter written by a person in custody on a charge or after conviction of any offence or by any inmate or patient of any sanatorium or mental hospital is addressed to the Ombudsman, it shall be forwarded immediately, unopened, to the Ombudsman by the person for the time being in charge of the place or institution where the writer of the letter is detained or of which he is an inmate or patient. R.S., c. 327, s. 12.

Statutory prohibitions inapplicable
13 Notwithstanding any other Act providing that a decision, recommendation, act or omission is final or that no appeal lies in respect thereof or that no proceeding, decision, recommendation, act or omission of a department or municipal unit or officer thereof is to be challenged, reviewed, quashed or called in question, the Ombudsman may exercise the powers under this Act. R.S., c. 327, s. 13.

Refusal or cessation of investigation
14 (1) The Ombudsman, in his discretion, may refuse to investigate or may cease to investigate a grievance if
(a) an adequate remedy or right of appeal already exists whether or not the complainant has availed himself of the remedy or right of appeal;
(b) the grievance is trivial, frivolous, vexatious or not made in good faith;
(c) having regard to all the circumstances of the case, further investigation is unnecessary;
(d) the grievance relates to any decision, recommendation, act or omission of which the complainant has had knowledge for more than one year before complaining;
(e) the complainant does not have a sufficient personal interest in the subject-matter of the grievance; or
(f) upon a balance of convenience between the public interest and the person aggrieved the Ombudsman is of the opinion that the grievance should not be investigated.
(2) Where the Ombudsman decides not to investigate or to cease to investigate a grievance he shall inform the complainant and any other interested person of his decision and may state his reasons therefor. R.S., c. 327, s. 14.

Notification of investigation
15 Where the Ombudsman intends to investigate a grievance under this Act, he shall
(a) in the case of a grievance relating to a department, notify the minister and the chief officer of the department;
(b) in the case of a grievance relating to a municipal unit, notify the chief officer of the municipal unit. R.S., c. 327, s. 15.

Nature of investigation
16 (1) Every investigation under this Act is to be conducted in private.
(2) Subject to this Act, the Ombudsman may hear or obtain information from any person and may make inquiries.
(3) The Ombudsman may hold hearings under this Act but, subject to subsections (4) and (5), no person is entitled as of right to be heard by the Ombudsman.
(4) Where during an investigation the Ombudsman is satisfied that there is prima facie evidence that
(a) a department or officer thereof administered a law of the Province;
(b) a municipal unit or officer thereof administered a law of the municipal unit or any law of the Province that applies to the municipal unit, so as to cause a grievance or to give cause for a grievance, he shall so advise the minister and the chief officer of the department or the chief officer of the municipal unit, as the case may be, and the officer causing the grievance and give each an opportunity to be heard.
(5) Where a minister, a chief officer or officer thereof appears at a hearing under subsection (4), the minister, chief officer or officer, as the case may be, is entitled to counsel.
(6) The Ombudsman may at any time during or after an investigation consult a minister or chief officer of a department or a municipal unit concerned in the matter of the investigation.
(7) Before forming a final opinion on any matter referred to in subsection (1) of Section 20, the Ombudsman shall consult with
(a) the minister, when the investigation relates to a department, a recommendation to the minister or when the minister requests; or
(b) the chief officer of the municipal unit when the investigation relates to a municipal unit.
(8) Where during or after an investigation the Ombudsman is of the opinion that there is evidence of a breach of duty or misconduct by a department or municipal unit or officer thereof, he shall refer the matter to the minister and chief officer of the department or the chief officer of the municipal unit.
(9) Subject to this Act and any rules made under Section 25, the Ombudsman may regulate his procedure. R.S., c. 327, s. 16.

Furnishing of information
17 (1) Subject to subsections (2), (3), (4), (5), (6) and (7) and Section 18, where the Ombudsman requests a person who, in the opinion of the Ombudsman, is able to furnish information relating to a matter being investigated by the Ombudsman to furnish such information, that person shall furnish that information and produce any documents or papers that, in the opinion of the Ombudsman, relate to the matter and that may be in the possession or under the control of that person whether or not that person is an officer of a department or municipal unit, and whether or not the documents and papers are in the custody or under the control of that department or municipal unit.
(2) The Ombudsman may summon before him and examine on oath
(a) any officer of a department or municipal unit who, in his opinion, is able to give any information referred to in subsection (1);
(b) any complainant; and
(c) with the approval of the Attorney General, any other person who, in the opinion of the Ombudsman, is able to give any information referred to in subsection (1).
(3) The oath referred to in subsection (2) is to be administered by the Ombudsman.
(4) Subject to subsection (5), where a person is bound by any law or by an enactment to maintain secrecy in relation to, or not to disclose any matter, the Ombudsman shall not require that person to supply any information or to answer any question in relation to that matter or to produce any document or paper relating to the matter which would be in breach of the obligation of secrecy or non-disclosure.
(5) With the prior consent in writing of the complainant the Ombudsman may require a person to whom subsection (4) applies to supply information or answer questions or produce documents or papers relating only to the complainant and that person shall do so.
(6) The rules for taking evidence in the Supreme Court apply to evidence given by a person required to give information, answer questions and produce documents or papers under this Act.
(7) Any person required to attend a hearing under this Act is entitled to the same fees, allowance and expenses as if he were a witness in the Supreme Court.
(8) Except on the trial of a person for perjury, evidence given by any person in proceedings before the Ombudsman and evidence of any proceeding before the Ombudsman is not admissible against any person in any court or in any proceedings of a judicial nature.
(9) No person is liable for an offence against any Act by reason of his compliance with any requirement of the Ombudsman under this Act. R.S., c. 327, s. 17.

Limitations on provision of information
18 (1) Where the Attorney General certifies that the giving of any information or the answering of any question or the production of any document or paper may disclose
(a) deliberations of the Executive Council; or
(b) activities of the Executive Council or any member of the Executive Council relating to matters of a secret or confidential nature and would be injurious to the public interest, the Ombudsman shall not require the information or answer to be given or the document or paper produced.
(2) Subject to subsection (1), a rule of law that authorizes or requires the withholding of any document, paper or thing, or the refusal to answer any question on the ground that the disclosure of the document, paper or thing, or the answering of the question would be injurious to the public interest, does not apply in respect of any investigation by or proceedings before the Ombudsman. R.S., c. 327, s. 18.

Right of entry and investigation
19 (1) For the purposes of this Act, the Ombudsman may enter upon any premises occupied by any department or municipal unit and, subject to Sections 17 and 18, carry out any investigation within his jurisdiction.
(2) Before entering any premises under subsection (1) the Ombudsman shall notify the chief officer of the department or municipal unit of his intention to enter the premises. R.S., c. 327, s. 19.

Report of Ombudsman if grievance established
20 (1) Where upon investigation the Ombudsman is of the opinion that a grievance exists or may exist because a department or municipal unit or officer thereof administered or is administering a law of the Province or a law of the municipal unit or a law of the Province that applies to the municipal unit
(a) unreasonably, unjustly, oppressively or in a discriminatory manner, or pursuant to a rule of law, enactment or practice that so results;
(b) under mistake of law or fact, in whole or in part;
(c) wrongly;
(d) contrary to law; or
(e) by using a discretionary power for an improper purpose, or on irrelevant grounds, or by taking irrelevant considerations into account, or by failing to give reasons for the use of a discretionary power when reasons should have been given, and if the Ombudsman is of the opinion that
(f) the grievance should be referred to the department or municipal unit or officer thereof for further consideration;
(g) an omission should be rectified;
(h) a decision should be cancelled or rectified;
(i) a practice by reason of which the grievance arose or may arise should be altered;
(j) a law by reason of which the grievance arose or may arise should be reconsidered;
(k) reasons should be given for the use of a discretionary power; or
(l) other steps should be taken as he may advise, the Ombudsman shall report his opinion, his reasons therefor and any recommendation to the minister and the chief officer of the department or the chief officer of the municipal unit concerned.
(2) Where the Ombudsman makes a recommendation under subsection (1) he may request the department or municipal unit to notify him within a specified time of the steps it proposes to take to give effect to his recommendations.
(3) Where, after the time stated under subsection (2), the department or municipal unit does not act upon the recommendation of the Ombudsman, refuses to act thereon or acts in a manner unsatisfactory to the Ombudsman, the Ombudsman may send a copy of his report and recommendation to the Governor in Council, in the case of a department, or the council of the municipal unit, in the case of a municipal unit, and may thereafter make a report to the House.
(4) The Ombudsman shall include with any report made under subsection (3) a copy of any comment made by the department or municipal unit upon his opinion or recommendation.
(5) In any report made by him under this Act the Ombudsman shall not make any finding or comment that is adverse to any person unless he gives that person an opportunity to be heard. R.S., c. 327, s. 20.

Duty to inform complainant
21 (1) Where the Ombudsman makes a recommendation under subsection (1) of Section 20 and the department or municipal unit does not act upon such recommendation to his satisfaction, the Ombudsman shall inform the complainant of his recommendation and may add any comment.
(2) The Ombudsman shall in any case inform the complainant in the manner and time he deems proper of the result of the investigation. R.S., c. 327, s. 21.

Review of decision of Ombudsman
22 No proceeding of the Ombudsman is void for want of form and, except on the ground of lack of jurisdiction, no proceedings or decisions of the Ombudsman are to be challenged, reviewed, quashed or called in question in any court. R.S., c. 327, s. 22.

No liability or compellability of Ombudsman or personnel
23 (1) No proceedings lie against the Ombudsman or against any person holding any office or appointment under the Ombudsman for any thing he may do or report or say in the course of the exercise or intended exercise of his functions under this Act, unless it is shown he acted in bad faith.



(2) The Ombudsman and any person holding any office or appointment under the Ombudsman shall not be called to give evidence in any court or in any proceedings of a judicial nature in respect of any thing coming to his knowledge in the exercise of his functions under this Act. R.S., c. 327, s. 23.
Reports

24 (1) The Ombudsman shall report annually to the House on the exercise of his functions under this Act.
(2) The Ombudsman, in the public interest or in the interests of a person, department or municipal unit, may publish reports relating generally to the exercise of his functions under this Act or to any particular case investigated by him, whether or not the matters to be dealt with in the report have been the subject of a report made to the House under this Act. R.S., c. 327, s. 24.

General rules
25 The House may make general rules for the guidance of the Ombudsman in the exercise of his functions under this Act. R.S., c. 327, s. 25.

Offences and penalties
26 Every person who
(a) without lawful justification or excuse wilfully obstructs, hinders or resists the Ombudsman or any other person in the exercise of his functions under this Act;
(b) without lawful justification or excuse refuses or wilfully fails to comply with any lawful requirements of the Ombudsman or any other person under this Act;
(c) wilfully makes any false statement to or misleads or attempts to mislead the Ombudsman or any other person in the exercise of his functions under this Act; or
(d) refuses or wilfully fails to comply with subsection (4) of Section 12, is guilty of an offence and on summary conviction is liable to a penalty not exceeding five hundred dollars. R.S., c. 327, s. 26.

Existing right or remedy preserved
27 This Act does not affect, abrogate, abridge or infringe or authorize the abrogation, abridgement or infringement of any substantive or procedural right or remedy existing elsewhere or otherwise than in this Act. R.S., c. 327, s. 27.

Regulations
28 (1) The Governor in Council may make regulations designating an agency, board, commission, foundation or corporation for the purpose of clause (a) of Section 2.
(2) The exercise by the Governor in Council of the authority contained in subsection (1) is regulations within the meaning of the Regulations Act. 2004, c. 6, s. 26.

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

This page and its contents published by the Office of the Legislative Counsel, Nova Scotia House of Assembly, and © 2005 Crown in right of Nova Scotia. Created April 4, 2005. Send comments to legc.office@gov.ns.ca.

YOUR COMMENTS ARE WELCOME!

THANK YOU FOR SHARING

YOUR THOUGHTS

Shelburne County's natural, built and human resources provide a promising base for planning and launching development plans and initiatives. Combined with our unique cultural, geographic, environmental and socio-political attributes we see fertile ground for visualizing a bright new future for our communities as well as future generations.

 Your comments in support of this effort are welcome. Off topic comments will be rejected.

Thoughts on Civic Activism....

*****TRANSFORMING CLIENTS INTO CITIZENS******

Dear Reader: I recently had a discussion with a friend about the sometimes frustrating loneliness of civic activisim as well as the exhileration felt when the lethargy of government and bureacracy is overcome and movement in the right direction takes place. It reminded me of my philosophical grounding and the underlying motivation that prompts people in free societies to challenge the status quo.

As you probably know by now dear reader, I believe that individually none of us is large enough to take on the establishment by ourselves. Nonetheless, acting individually as citizens I know we can have an impact by pushing, prodding and at times annoying the establishement into do the right thing.... and motivating others to join us.  

Our efforts can result in changes ... as support grows for the obvious solutions needed - however long and labourious the journey might be, if we all act .....

That starting point is at the heart of this tiny blog..... I draw for this reasoning from my reading of history and philosophy ... and the development of modern thought respecting organized society.

Plato's account of the famous Greek philosopher Socrates' trial is the first and most famous  illustration of this essential concept behind the working of democratic societies and the key role of citizens and an unfettered  press in a free society.

SOCRATES

One of the most famous trials in history ocurred in 399 BC. Socrates was tried and convicted by the courts of democratic Athens on a charge of corrupting the youth and disbelieving in the ancestral gods (challenging conventional wisdom). Reading the history of the day it is clear that Socrates was seen as one who challenged the political establishment throughout his life.

Plato, his erstwhile follower describes how Socrates at trial defended himself as a small irritating, persistent gnat determined to move a large lazy horse. During his defense when on trial for his life, Socrates, according to Plato's writings, pointed out that dissent, like the tiny (relative to the size of a horse) gadfly, was easy to swat, but the cost to society of silencing individuals who were irritating could be very high. "If you kill a man like me, you will injure yourselves more than you will injure me," because he claimed his self-proclaimed role was that of a gadfly, "to sting people and whip them into a fury, all in the service of truth."

"Gadfly" is a term used to describe people (our social consience) who upset the status quo by posing irritating, upsetting or novel questions.  In modern and local politics, gadfly is a term used to describe individuals who persistently challenge people in positions of power, the status quo or a popular position. The word today is sometimes used in a pejorative sense, but the historical use over the centuries by people like Benjamin Franklin was as a descriptor of honourable work or performance of civic duty.

Today, as local politicians are jockeying to re-define (or not) the development agencies in our region, it is time for all of us to become gadflies, pushing, prodding and directing politicians and civil servants to do the right thing.... nipping at their heals and rumps so to speak!

My two cents....

Back to blogging!

*****TRANSFORMING CLIENTS INTO CITIZENS******

Dear Readers,


As you may or may not know ..... I recently started a business and economic development consulting company here in Shelburne called Strategic Perspectives Consulting Associates and its been busy since last January.
In addition .... I am a Director and agent for a Nova Scotia company called International Resource Development Corporation with its office here in Shelburne and its headquarters in Montreal. Last January the President of IRDC and I put together an international consortium with companies in England, Denmark and Holland and bid on a major standing offer contract with the government of Canada ..... we've just been advised that we were successful and been selected to sign a multi-year contract with the Canadian International Development Agency. This morning I finished the draft operational contract for our consortium and its now on its way to our partners. We expect work under the contract to start early in the new year.

And... I am President of an internet radio station in Alberta that my son Kirk and his wife now operate as Leduc County's Home Radio Station...you can listen at http://www.leducradio.com/ . Last week we celebrated our first year of operation.

Finally.... Ocean Produce International is in the last stages of preperation for our lawsuit against SWSDA. This litigation has been going on for ten years and trial is scheduled to begin January 18th, 2010 for four weeks in Halifax. As you can imagine Willa and I've been intimately involved on a daily basis with trial preperation and will be for the next few months.

All this to explain why I haven't been posting as much as some of you would like!! I promise to make an effort to post at least once a week until we get to trial... but I expect posts will be short. ... Your patience in the interim is greatly appreciated.

Ed

To Ward or not To Ward!

*****TRANSFORMING CLIENTS INTO CITIZENS******

THAT IS THE QUESTION!!

Thank you Anon 3:40 for your thoughtful comment and reply at 11:42 PM.  Here's my reasoning and its based in part on my present observation of the last quarter century.... I may be wrong in my assessment .... but I doubt it.... (;-)

A quick review of our present array of Councillors and Mayor and where they live will show that the majority .... are concentrated in one-third of the geographic area covered by the town.  None live in the less affluent areas of our community. In fact, that is a pattern of political representation that has dominated local politics for more than a quarter of a century in our community.

A ward system would force a change in this pattern and would provide an opportunity for folks from all geographic areas of Shelburne to elect representatives to sit at the Council table and represent their priorities and needs. When was the last time someone from the south end of Shelburne got elected? And, if an issue had a deleterious impact on a less affluent section of our community, who could be counted on today to make the case to representatives from other parts of town?

We presently have six councillors and I would propose six districts or wards for our community - one for the south-east side of King Street, one for the north-east side of King Street, two for the centre of town, one for the north and north-west end of town and one for the historic district and proximate areas.

As for running for Mayor, I believe there are many young, capable and intelligent folks in our community who would be much better suited to fill that post than me. Actually, I would like to see a better age distribution in council with more twenty, thirty and forty year-olds and I would like to see more debate during elections about priorities in each of the districts I've already mentioned. I am happy to help and be an active citizen as I think we should all do and make my political contribution by voting for the best candidates that are presented.

Thank you Anon 3:42 .... I think this is an important issue and understand your concerns in this matter....as I hope you understand my views on the issue..... even if you don't agree... (;-)

Question For Anonymous 3:40 PM Today

*****TRANSFORMING CLIENTS INTO CITIZENS******

Dear Anonymous 3:40 PM:

Interesting comments. Am puzzled by your rejection of wards to elect councillors. That is because I think electing councillors to represent a specific constituency would make them more accountable to their electors. I'd be interested in your reasons for rejecting election by wards or districts and any ideas you might have to make elected municipal politicians more accountable to the electors.

I'd also welcome any suggestions or comments from others on this question.

Keep the Picture!

*****TRANSFORMING CLIENTS INTO CITIZENS******

THAT'S ALL THAT'S LEFT!

For those of you who went to Council on Wednesday or watched it on Eastlink on Thursday, you will have heard our local politicians skating around the issues related to the Moby Dick church. It was interesting to watch and those I've spoken with have all had their own take on the public airing of the views of local politicians on the issue.

I honestly had mixed views on whether we should keep the church or not or how we should dispose of it if we chose not to keep it. I could have lived comfortably with either decision. What I was looking for was a more public process for dealing with public issues.... and I did get a bit more.... not much... but a bit!

I agree that once elected politicians are mandated to deal with public issues as they arise. In normal political systems, politicians are rewarded or punished for the manner in which they deal with public issues by their constituents at election time. Unfortunately, our municipal system in the Town of Shelburne does not facilitate that method of accountability because of the system we have for electing our councillors at large. This way, no one gets credit and no one gets blamed.... great for politicians... lousy for democracy.

Want to have local politicians more accountable? Change our present system for electing councillors and you'll see a dramatic change in local politics. Councllors elected by geographic areas (wards or districts) know who they are accountable to, while those elected at large do as they please most of the time (until election time nears) and have no real obligation to consult the electorate.

That's my view anyway.....

BTW.... I also believe that crushing the church and hauling it off to a landfill was a waste of resources that might have been used by others.... and the worst solution from an environmental perspective.... what a waste of lumber!